SERAP warns Buhari over Nigerian military monitoring social media
Socio-Economic
Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has sent an open letter to President
Muhammadu Buhari requesting him to instruct the military authorities to
immediately end any monitoring of activities of Nigerians on the social media,
and to ensure that military operations comply with Nigerian Constitution 1999
(as amended) and the country’s obligations under international human rights
law.
A letter
signed by SERAP deputy director Timothy Adewale the organization expressed
serious concern that any monitoring of Nigerians would directly violate the
constitutionally and internationally guaranteed rights to freedom of expression
and privacy online.
The
organization said that such is neither necessary nor proportionate, and could portray
Buhari’s government as working to control the political and social media space.
“Classifying
legitimate exercise of freedom of expression as ‘hate speech’ is
counter-productive, In exercise of their rights to freedom of expression and
privacy, Nigerians should be allowed to speak truth to power and stand up for
their rights”, SERAP warned.
According to
the organization, “Monitoring Nigerians on social media would criminalize their
freedom and the activity of journalists that are critical of the government and
censor the media from reporting on sensitive and critical information that is
relevant to the public interest but controversial to the government. It would
have a chilling effect on media activities in Nigeria, and pose a serious
threat to the ability of Nigerians to meaningfully participate in their own
government.”
“To monitor Nigerians’
access to social media solely on the basis that it may be used to express views
critical of the government or the political social system espoused by the
government is entirely incompatible and inconsistent with constitutional
guarantees and Nigeria’s international human rights obligations and
commitments.
“SERAP notes
that protecting critical expression on the Internet is the standard by which
governments are now held to be considered genuinely democratic. Nigerians
should therefore be allowed to discuss government policies and engage in
political debate; report on corruption in government; and exercise their right
to expression of opinion and dissent.
“While we
recognize the obligation to protect against hate speech that constitutes
incitement to hostility, discrimination or violence, this should not be used as
a pretext to clampdown on legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of
expression that does not constitute incitement to discrimination, hostility or
violence. Blanket clarification of expression that falls short of expression
that constitutes incitement to violence, hatred or discrimination under
international law can only limit media freedom and chill discourse deemed
controversial or critical of your government.”
“SERAP notes
that sections 37 and 39 of the Nigerian Constitution guarantee the rights to
privacy and freedom of expression. Similarly, article 19 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Nigeria is a state party
protects Nigerians’ right to maintain an opinion without interference and to
seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of
frontiers. Under article 19(3) of the Covenant, restrictions on the right to
freedom of expression must be “provided by law”, and necessary for “the rights
or reputations of others” or “for the protection of national security or of
public order (ordre public), or of public health and morals”. Permissible
restrictions on the internet are the same as those offline.”
“Further,
article 17(1) of the Covenant provides for the rights of Nigerians to be
protected, inter alia, against unlawful or arbitrary interference with their
privacy and correspondence, and provides that everyone has the right to the
protection of the law against such interference. “Unlawful” means that no
interference may take place except in cases envisaged by the law which in
itself must comply with provisions, aims and objectives of the Covenant. SERAP
believes that articles 17 and 19 of the Covenant are closely connected, as the
right to privacy is an essential requirement for the realization of the right
to freedom of expression.”
“SERAP notes
the Human Rights Council resolution 20/8 on the promotion, protection and
enjoyment of human rights on the Internet adopted on 5 July 2012, which affirms
that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, in
particular freedom of expression, which is applicable regardless of frontiers
and through any media of one’s choice. It further called upon all States to
promote and facilitate access to the Internet and international cooperation
aimed at the development of media and information and communications facilities
in all countries.”
Comments