Twitter makes another rule change; to tackle revenge porn
In the
latest of its (likely fruitless) attempts to govern the seething mob that
comprises its user base, Twitter rolled out a change in how it oversees the
publication of what it euphemistically referred to as ‘intimate media’. Even
@odey_owojela is watching this closely.
The latest
rule change intends to combat yet another toxic Twitter problem; the prevalence
of revenge porn throughout its network.
Earlier this
year, Twitter was under fire for its slow response to naked photographs that
were distributed by Rob Kardashian of his ex-girlfriend, seemingly without her
consent. The photos circulated on the site for thirty minutes before they were
taken down.
The new
policy from Twitter states that no one can post or share “intimate photos or
videos” of someone that were produced or distributed without their consent.
Twitter’s
definition of “intimate media” includes content captured with a hidden camera
that may involve “nudity, partial nudity, and/or sexual acts”; images that are
sometimes called ‘creepshots’ that involve a user being able to see genitalia,
buttocks, or breasts of another person; images or videos taken “in a private
setting and not intended for public distribution”; and any other images that
may be deemed private.
The company
noted that some forms of consensual nudity and adult content are permitted on
the site and gave itself a pretty big loophole should it fail to respond to
something that could be a violation of its policy in a timely manner.
The new
policy states:
To help
prevent our teams from making a mistake and removing consensual intimate media,
we may require a report from the actual subject or their authorized
representative prior to taking any enforcement action. We will reply back to
those reports via email and request that the subject provide documentation to
verify their identity. Please note that this documentation will be destroyed
once it is no longer needed by Twitter to evaluate the case and will not be
shared with any third parties. We will not share any details about who reported
this content with the violator.
Luckily,
this burden of proof standard doesn’t apply to “creepshots or upskirts.” In
those instances Twitter won’t require documentation, “as it is often difficult
for victims of this content to identify themselves.”
Any account
in violation of the new rules will be suspended, once Twitter identifies that
the content was, indeed, distributed without consent. Retweeters will be asked
to remove offending tweets with a warning that if they continue to violate the
policy, their Twitter accounts will be suspended.
Of course,
as one of my esteemed co-workers noted, all of this is academic, since Twitter
doesn’t allow harassment or hate speech on its site either — and those policies
have worked out incredibly well.
Comments