White House aides reportedly blindsided by 'embarrassing' Trump interview
White House
aides were mortified by President Donald Trump's 30-minute interview with The
New York Times, the contents of which dominated headlines all day Friday.
The interview
published on Thursday hit on some familiar topics for Trump: the ongoing Russia
investigation, his legislative achievements, and some domestic and world
affairs.
The
president was largely unfiltered in the one-on-one with The Times, to the
chagrin of his staffers back in Washington who were reportedly caught off-guard
by both the interview itself, and Trump's musings with a reporter who was
invited to speak with the president by one of Trump's close confidants, Newsmax
CEO Christopher Ruddy.
According to
The Washington Post, the encounter rattled Trump's White House aides, who were
not present for the interview; a lapse known to cause ripple-effects due to
Trump's tendency to speak off-the-cuff in a way that invariably captures
headlines worldwide.
By all
accounts, White House chief of staff John Kelly has put in considerable effort
to moderate access to Trump and filter the information he consumes, which is
why Trump's interview with The Times reportedly sent some Oval Office staff
scrambling.
The Post's
Ashley Parker and Josh Dawsey reported that Hope Hicks, the White House
communications director, got on the phone once she received word of the
president's sit-down with The Times to "check in on the interview from
afar." Another aide The Post described as "frustrated" called
the interview "embarrassing."
Trump
frequently mingles with guests when visiting his private properties like
Mar-a-Lago in Florida. And after a year in office, that is still a thorn in the
side of those charged with monitoring the interactions of a president who is
easily influenced by outside feedback.
An unnamed
former White House staffer told The Post: "At Mar-a-Lago, anyone who can
get within eyesight changes the game."
Comments