Google hit with €4.3bn Android fine from EU
Google has
been fined a record €4.34bn ($5bn; £3.9bn) over Android.
The European
Commission said the firm had used the mobile operating system to illegally
"cement its dominant position" in search.
The firm's
parent Alphabet has been given 90 days to change its business practices or face
further penalties of up to 5% of its average global daily turnover.
It has said
it plans to appeal.
However, it
could easily afford the fine if required - its cash reserves totalled nearly
$103bn at the end of March.
Media
captionWATCH: Margrethe Vestager says the record-sized fine is a result of
Google's illegal behaviour
At a press
conference in Brussels, Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said
consumers needed choice.
And she
suggested the ruling could lead manufacturers to sell smart devices using
different versions of the Android operating system to Google's, such as
Amazon's Fire OS, which she said they had been prevented from doing.
"This
will change the market place," she said.
Google's
chief executive Sundar Pichai has blogged in response.
"Rapid
innovation, wide choice, and falling prices are classic hallmarks of robust
competition and Android has enabled all of them," he wrote.
"Today's
decision rejects the business model that supports Android, which has created
more choice for everyone, not less."
Ms Vestager
previously fined Google €2.4bn ($2.8bn; £2.1bn) over a separate probe into its
shopping comparison service - a ruling the tech firm is in the process of
appealing against.
In addition,
her team has a third investigation underway into Google's advert-placing
business AdSense.
Ms Vestager
alleges that there are three ways that Google has acted illegally:
it required Android handset and tablet
manufacturers to pre-install the Google Search app and its own web browser
Chrome as a condition for allowing them to offer access to its Play app store
it made payments to large manufacturers and
mobile network operators that agreed to exclusively pre-install the Google
Search app on their devices
it prevented manufacturers from selling any
smart devices powered by alternative "forked" versions of Android by
threatening to refuse them permission to pre-install its apps
Ms Vestager
acknowledged that Google's version of Android does not prevent device owners
downloading alternative web browsers or using other search engines.
But she said
that only 1% of users downloaded a competing search app, and 10% a different
browser.
"Once
you have it, it is working, very few are curious enough to look for another
search app or browser," she said.
The
Competition Commissioner said that Google carried out its abuse at a time when
the mobile internet was growing quickly, helping it ensure that its
advertising-supported search service repeated the success it had already found
on desktop computers.
She cannot
turn the clock back, but said the size of the fine had been based on the firm's
search-related earnings from Android devices in Europe since 2011.
She has,
however, said the firm must now stop all of the practices outlined above and
refrain from any measures with a similar goal.
Russia may
give one example of how this could be achieved.
After
similar complaints by the country's regulator, Google now offers Android users
a choice between Google, Yandex and Mail.ru as the default search engine the
first time they use the Chrome browser.
Yandex in
particular has benefited from this.
Since the
change in June 2017, the Moscow-based firm has seen its share of mobile search
rise from about 34% to 46%, according to Statcounter.
What has the
reaction been?
The European
Commission first began scrutinising Android in April 2015, after a complaint by
Fairsearch - a trade group that originally included Microsoft, Nokia and Oracle
among its members.
It claims
the case has dragged on for so long because Google had used "every trick
in its book to delay action".
But the
group welcomed the commissioner's intervention.
"This
is an important step in disciplining Google's abusive behaviour in relation to
Android", said spokesman Thomas Vinje.
"It
means that Google should cease its anti-competitive practices regarding
smartphones, but also in other areas - smart TVs in particular - where it is
foreclosing competition by using the same practices."
A trade body
representing mobile operators has also greeted the development.
"This
will enable consumers to benefit from a greater choice of mobile services, and
allow more players to innovate and offer new services in the market," said
the GSMA's chief regulatory officer John Giusti.
The European
Commission had the power to fine Google up to 10% of its annual revenue. Based
on its last annual report, that would have amounted to a maximum of $11.1bn
(£8.5bn).
The €4.3bn
figure is, however, a record-sized sum for the commission.
Depending on
your point of view, Margarethe Vestager is either the only global regulator
really standing up to arrogant American tech giants - or a busybody trying to
hobble innovative businesses because Europe can't build its own.
But today's
ruling shows the gulf that has opened up between US and European competition
policies.
In the
States the focus is on real and obvious harm to consumers in the form of higher
prices or less choice. They also seem more sympathetic to the tech giants'
argument that they can be easily toppled from their perches by feisty
start-ups.
European
regulators tend to take a wider view of markets, worrying about a "winner
takes it all" world, where a few mighty platforms appear to offer
consumers a shiny world of free or very cheap goodies, but in reality are
devoted to crushing any competition.
This culture
clash isn't going to fade away any time soon.
Cheered on
by many who are concerned about Silicon Valley's dominance, Ms Vestager will
not abandon her mission to tame the tech giants - and the likes of Google,
Apple and Amazon will fiercely resist any regulation that they see as a threat
to their lucrative business models.
Comments